Health Care Policies
As patients, we all demand the same level of care and treatment as the next person. All patients should be given the best available care that complies with responsible safety guidelines and best practice. There is a lot of pressure to maintain these regulations, with a constant need to meet requirements within financial means.
It is far too easy for practices to become outdated if these responsibilities are neglected. It is, therefore, vital that practices and healthcare providers work on careful, professional healthcare policies for staff. There needs to be a balance between standardization and best judgment, which is sometimes easier said than done.
Why Are These Public Policies And Procedures For Healthcare Organizations So Important?
Strict, up-to-date regulations ensure that healthcare providers are acting in a professional manner within the standards of key agencies and statutes. These regulations help to standardize practices across a sector of the health system, such as life sciences, to reduce variation. They also act as a strong point of reference for all staff members that rely on them.
This then reinforces the chance that all providers are working on the same page. These should be easily accessed via portals such as electronic policy libraries. These libraries should be available to staff with easy-to-read, searchable documents.
Standardization is necessary for health systems with multiple facilities under one administration. One life sciences clinic cannot always make up different rules for the other services under its umbrella. There are exceptions, depending on very specific patient care practices, but general public policies should remain the same.
There Is An Art To Creating These Guidelines In A Beneficial Way.
It is, therefore, crucial that those responsible take great care in creating or updating these clinical patient policies. The first step is to view at current national guidelines in the delivery of patient care. These can often be found via organizations such as the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Emergency Nurses Association.
These controlled guidelines reflect a high-level of practice at a national standard and are essential for updating the public policies of practices. Then there are red rules. These guidelines are highlighted for their importance and should be adhered to in most circumstances unless it is actually in the patient’s best interests. Simple “red rules” include the need to verify the identity of a patient through two factors and counting equipment before an invasive procedure.
Then there are the disclaimer statements. The problem with these regulations and the fundamental principle of best practice is that they are open to interpretation. Healthcare policies can include disclaimers about the importance of good judgment and discretion. It is up to the staff member in charge of treatment to decide whether or not the policy applies and how to relate the guidelines to that individual case.
Balancing Best Interests With Standard Procedure.
There are good intentions here. Human judgment on a case-by-case basis could ensure a personal approach to real ethics. However, deviation from the standard of care and a bad experience could be damaging. Practices need to avoid working on different levels of care. Those that do could find that some patients receive a lower standard of attention. Patients that become aware of this could claim for malpractice or negligence. It is all about finding that balance and remaining as compliant and transparent as possible.