Health Care Policies Standardized Guidelines
Discrepancies in the creation of healthcare policies and their interpretation can lead to different levels of care in one organization. This increases that organization’s risk exposure. There are potential outcomes here that healthcare providers need to avoid. The Joint Commission set the following leadership accreditation standard as an essential requirement.
“Patients with comparable needs [must] receive the same level of care, treatment, and services throughout the hospital” (Schyve, 2009). Patients may be concerned it is deemed that one life sciences clinic is working with two levels of care. Is one level more thorough and beneficial than the other? If so, have they received a lower standard of care than another patient?
This is why regulation and standardization is vital in these public policies. If all patients are to be treated equally, doctors and practitioners need to apply the same rules and procedures each time. The creation of “red rules” goes a long way to ensuring this.
These rules are national expectations that should be adhered to unless it is essential not to. Failure to comply with red rules could be disastrous. Patients that believe they have a case could file allegations of malpractice or corporate negligence.
Practitioners That Veer Away From The Rules Could Struggle To Validate Themselves In Legal Cases.
It can be difficult for practices to prove that this wasn’t the case. They need to prove that they acted in compliance with the “standard of care.” However, there can be different interpretations of what this standard of care means.
Experts will provide testimony and determine what a responsible healthcare provider with the same experience would have done in the situation. This can often be achieved by looking at national guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians or Emergency Nurses Association.
Legal disputes may also take into account the accessibility of these guidelines and the information presented to staff. Electron Policy libraries are an essential tool for highlighting directives and updates. However, poor library management and accessible could be problematic. Outdated and retired public policies should be archived and new healthcare policies made available to all staff.
Practitioners that stray from these guidelines and regulations in a negative way could face the consequences. It is easy to shift away from the norm when updating policy or making important judgment calls. This could be the best move in some cases. However, without careful planning, archiving and communication, this variation can be damaging.